tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769884.post6621932805075222611..comments2023-12-24T10:00:50.998-08:00Comments on Washington Husky Sports: Puppy ChowJohn Berkowitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02506119469461963535noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769884.post-39453355330162682382008-02-05T19:27:00.000-08:002008-02-05T19:27:00.000-08:00I am with you on the M's! While I am was not a big...I am with you on the M's! While I am was not a big Turner and Willingham fan, I am astonished that there is not a "Fire Bavasi" website out there. What a clown he is.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769884.post-2885258401964697272008-02-05T15:57:00.000-08:002008-02-05T15:57:00.000-08:00On the Moon issues, I think the first time he was ...On the Moon issues, I think the first time he was charged with Driving While Intoxicated which they can charge you with if you have any alcohol at all in your system. To my knowledge a Driving Under the Influence is only if you are over the legal limit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769884.post-31783988059278871812008-02-05T12:35:00.000-08:002008-02-05T12:35:00.000-08:00A poster on Dawgman raised a very valid point. If ...A poster on Dawgman raised a very valid point. If the Times series intent was to point out the "win at any cost" problem with college athletics why use just one team and one year from all the college teams available? I hope the UCLA folks looking into this series look at all sides of the information before publishing a conclusion. The Times used what they wanted to "make" their point ingoring all lot of good things about that teams players.<BR/>One question that pops up to me, given the innocent until proven guilty concept, it appears the Times ignores that in their judgement of RN's disciplinary actions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769884.post-39493556925169395862008-02-05T11:14:00.000-08:002008-02-05T11:14:00.000-08:00I think it is refreshing to see a journalist calli...I think it is refreshing to see a journalist calling the Times out for their lack of journalistic integrity in this series. A lot of the other journalists in the region danced around the issue and perhaps didn't want to speak out against their colleagues.<BR/><BR/>As I commented on Miller's blog and previously on this blog, the Times articles were based on the legitimate premise of investigating whether integrity was sacrificed for success in athletics. But the reporters did a hatchet job instead of objectively reporting the story. They ended up sacrificing their own integrity for success in increased circulation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com